“Development of National Character and importance in present day political situation.”
National character is an expression
which describes forms of collective self-perception, sensibility, and conduct
which are shared by the individuals who inhabit a modern nation-state. It
presupposes the existence of psychological and cultural homogeneity among the
citizens of each country, as well as the idea that each nation can be
considered a collective individual, with characteristics analogous to the
empirical individuals who are its inhabitants. This behavior is sometimes
considered on an abstract level, that is, as cultural behavior without actual
reference to necessarily different personality modalities. It may also be
considered as motivated by underlying psychological mechanisms characteristic
of a given people.
National character as institutional
pattern: In this approach, most common among political scientists, the national
character is epitomized by the dominant, or typical and representative,
institutions, particularly those concerned with politics and economics. The
basic objectives of national-character studies are to examine the tensions
underlying the political and social structures of modern states. Social
tensions are particularly apparent in societies that are rapidly changing. For
example, one type of social tension that is frequently observed results from
the systematic attempts of an elite to establish particular patterns of
directed social change, in spite of the unavailability of sufficient
individuals whose training and social experience equip them for achieving the
goals set by the elite. In one such study, Bauer attempted to demonstrate the
social tension existing between the political elite in Russian society and a
large number of individuals who are not motivationally involved in the same
ways as the members of the Communist party hierarchy (1948).
If necessary personality traits are
not forthcoming from a proportionate number of individuals within the society,
the society will not function well in terms of newer values, whatever the elite
controlling the society attempts to do. Even though institutional legal
structures are consciously changed in accord with social planning, if
characteristic changes in socialization experiences do not accompany these
changes in such a manner as to facilitate the appearance of adequate
motivational behavior, the sought-after change will not become stabilized and
self-perpetuating.
In another study indirectly
concerned with the psychological processes underlying dynamics of social change.
Hagen (1962), in a comprehensive study of economic and social change in a
number of discrete societies, cogently discussed the relationship of
personality variables to different economic traditions, such as colonialism or
feudalism, and the manner in which they either facilitate or hamper economic
development. This study is illustrative of the fact that considerations of
national character are having considerable influence in augmenting theoretical
approaches in economics and political science.